Medium Terms Fiscal Plan
for Sikkim
2011-2012 to 2013-2014
To be presented before the Sikkim
Legislative Assembly as required under sub section (1) of section 3
of the Sikkim Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act. 2010
(15 of 2010)
Medium Term Fiscal Plan
for Sikkim: 2011-12 to 2013-14
1. Introduction
– Fiscal Policy Overview
Growing emphasis on economic
development in Sikkim in recent years has brought about visible
transformation in local economy and society. The per capita income of
the state has almost doubled from Rs.30562 in 2004-05 to Rs.57916 in
2009-10.
The state has maintained a reasonably high rate of economic growth.
The Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) at current prices recorded a
growth rate of 14.58 per cent during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10.
The per-capita income (at current prices) also has grown at a high
rate of 13.17 per cent during this period. The State Government has
initiated major efforts to reduce poverty, expand social security
measures, and provide educational and health facilities. The human
development achieved by the state in terms of literacy rate and
health status has been impressive
and its track record in social sector achievements has been
remarkable
Ensuring sustainable fiscal balance for
the provision of the required level of physical and social
infrastructure is extremely important for the calibration of growth
oriented fiscal policy in the state. Containing the fiscal deficit
at a sustainable level is important to ensure that debt overhang does
not cause unsustainable debt servicing burden. At the same time, it
is important to allocate adequate resources for social and physical
infrastructure to create an enabling environment for investments
which would create employment and incomes for the people of the
state.
The Government of Sikkim has enacted
fiscal responsibility and budget management act (FRBM) in the fiscal
year 2010-11. Introduction of Fiscal Responsibility and Budget
Management (FRBM) Act and formulation of a medium term fiscal plan
(MTFP) in the state is aimed at designing and implementing a rule
based fiscal management system to ensure fiscal stability and
sustainability while ensuring efficient provision of public services.
The Act envisages a fiscal adjustment path recommended by the
Thirteenth Finance Commission (TFC) for Sikkim limiting fiscal
deficit at the targeted level to ensure sustainable level of debt,
and improving transparency in a medium term
framework during 2010-15. In this context
the Act provides quantitative targets to be adhered to by the state
with regard to deficit measures and debt level. The MTFP
enunciates the broad fiscal management of the State Government to
achieve the prescribed fiscal adjustment path in the medium term. The
fiscal management principles enshrined in the Act call upon the state
government to ensure transparency in setting and implementation of
fiscal policy, stability and predictability in policy making process,
improve the management of public finance and ensure intergenerational
fairness, and improve efficiency in the design and implementation of
fiscal policy related to management of assets and liabilities.
Enacting the FRBM Act was important for Sikkim to ensure fiscal
stability and gain from the state specific grants recommended by the
TFC. For Sikkim, the state-specific grants and the
performance incentive grants, assume significance as regards their
quantum and conditionalities. The basic
necessary condition to avail these grants is the enactment of FRBM
and adherence to the fiscal adjustment path recommend by the TFC for
Sikkim. The government of Sikkim is keen to avail these funds
to increase its revenue resources for development of the State.
Sikkim, as per TFC’s projection does not qualify for NPRD grant
and non-availability of NPRD in the last two years of 12th FC’s
award period appeared to have adversely impacted on the fiscal
balance of the state. It is thus important for the government of
Sikkim to make every effort to avail these conditional grants to
improve the fiscal position of the State. It needs to be noted here
that, while, the State has not received the NPRD, the TFC, in
recognition of the effort put by the State in achieving considerable
progress in fiscal situation and challenges like cost disabilities
recommended a performance grant as an incentive to continue on its
path of fiscal prudence. As per the TFC’s recommendation,
Sikkim also will be eligible to get benefits of debt consolidation as
per the terms and conditions recommended by the 12th FC, provided the
state enacts the FRBM.
The fiscal policy in the context of FRBM broadly focuses on critical
areas like augmentation of revenues, rationalization of expenditure,
debt restructuring and management, and above all strict enforcement
of fiscal discipline and accountability. Indeed the fiscal management
in terms of expenditure rationalization and revenue generation
measures have helped in achieving perceptible improvement in fiscal
situation of the State in the past, which has been recognised by the
TFC in their report while recommending performance incentive grant
for Sikkim.
The MTFP is divided into following
sections. In Section 2, the economic growth achieved by the State in
recent years is analysed. The Section 3 contains the fiscal policy
overview, tax, expenditure, and borrowing policies for the ensuing
year and the priorities in the medium term. This section follows the
Form F-1 of the Medium Term Fiscal Policy as per the Sikkim FRBM Act,
Rule 3. In Section 4, Medium Term Fiscal Plan containing the
projection of fiscal variables and assumption underlying the
projections has been given. This follows the Form F 2 of the Medium
Term Fiscal Policy as per the Sikkim FRBM Act, Rule 3. The concluding
remarks are contained in section 5. The disclosures, following the
Medium Term Fiscal Policy as per the Sikkim FRBM Act Rule 3 and Rule
4, are given in the Section called Disclosures.
2. Macroeconomic Outlook
An assessment of the recent economic
performance of the State is essential while preparing MTFP for the
State. Role of fiscal policy is crucial in creating efficient levels
of infrastructure and promoting human development to provide a strong
basis for economic growth and development. While the level of
economic growth influences the revenue performance, fiscal discipline
and allocation of resources consistent with policy priorities help in
stability, growth and equity aspects of the economic policy.
Preparation of a medium term fiscal policy framework for the State
enables continuity in decision making and helps in improving revenue
effort and expenditure planning. As mentioned earlier, the average
growth of the State's economy during the period 2004-05 to 2009-10
was 14.58 per cent. The sectoral composition of the GSDP is dominated
by the Service sector. In the year 2008-09, the share of services was
48.28 per cent and that of Manufacturing and Primary sector was 34.66
and 17.22 per cent respectively. TFC has assumed a nominal growth
rate of 11.08 per cent in GSDP for Sikkim during the period 2010-15.
However, based on the trend of growth in Sikkim, a higher growth
rate of GSDP for Sikkim is definitely attainable. However the MTFP is
based on the GSDP growth path prescribed by the TFC for Sikkim. If we
take the actual GSDP growth, the nominal borrowing quantum would be
higher.
3. Fiscal Profile of the State
3.1 Fiscal Improvement in Recent years
Sikkim has maintained surplus in the
revenue account during the period 2004-05 to 2011-12 (BE) (Table 1).
The own revenue receipt of the State has improved from 13.13 per cent
relative to GSDP in 2004-05 to 19.54 per cent in 2009-10, the last
year for which audited figures are available. The own revenue receipt
is expected to decline to 14.46 per cent as per the BE 2011-12. The
revenue expenditure, while on a declining path from 2004-05 level of
48 per cent, started increasing from 2009-10 and is expected to be
54.35 per cent in 2011-12 BE. The TFC, in recognition of the effort
put by the State in the past in achieving considerable progress in
fiscal consolidation and also recognizing and the challenges like
cost disabilities faced by the states, recommended a performance
grants.
The fiscal deficit in the State has
shown wide fluctuations. While, the fiscal deficit showed a declining
trend relative to GSDP after 2004-05 and came down to 2.56 per cent
in 2007-08, it has increased since then. However, fiscal deficit
reached to a level of 13.22 per cent in 2010-11 RE primarily due to
the implementation of the Pay Commission award. The fiscal deficit is
expected to be 3.5 per cent of GSDP in 2011-12 BE. After three
consecutive years of primary deficit, the BE 2011-12 expects to
generate a primary surplus to the order of 1.06 per cent of GSDP. The
outstanding debt to GSDP ratio is expected to decline from a level as
high as 70.46 per cent in 2009-10 to 64.12 per cent in 2011-12 BE.
Table 1
Fiscal Profile of Sikkim: An Overview
(% to GSDP)
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11 (RE)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
Revenues
|
58.15
|
54.60
|
55.68
|
59.77
|
60.07
|
68.28
|
70.15
|
76.93
|
Own Revenue
|
13.13
|
13.10
|
15.96
|
16.36
|
16.79
|
19.54
|
12.68
|
14.46
|
Own Tax Revenues
|
6.73
|
7.39
|
8.01
|
7.90
|
6.81
|
6.51
|
6.14
|
6.38
|
Own Non-Tax Revenues
|
6.40
|
5.72
|
7.95
|
8.46
|
9.98
|
13.03
|
6.54
|
8.08
|
Central Transfers
|
45.02
|
41.50
|
39.72
|
43.41
|
43.28
|
48.74
|
57.47
|
62.48
|
Tax Devolution
|
6.17
|
9.14
|
10.31
|
13.77
|
12.44
|
10.91
|
13.81
|
14.95
|
Grants
|
38.85
|
32.36
|
29.41
|
29.64
|
30.84
|
37.83
|
43.66
|
47.52
|
Revenue Expenditure
|
48.44
|
44.73
|
45.08
|
45.76
|
47.17
|
53.25
|
58.02
|
54.35
|
Interest Payment
|
5.70
|
5.15
|
5.33
|
4.70
|
5.27
|
4.50
|
5.14
|
4.56
|
Pension
|
1.77
|
2.08
|
2.28
|
2.00
|
2.03
|
3.66
|
3.84
|
3.54
|
Capital Expenditure
|
20.38
|
17.34
|
15.07
|
16.56
|
20.90
|
19.95
|
25.35
|
26.08
|
Capital Outlay
|
20.33
|
17.35
|
15.11
|
16.58
|
20.90
|
18.88
|
25.22
|
25.03
|
Net Lending
|
0.05
|
-0.01
|
-0.04
|
-0.02
|
0.00
|
1.07
|
0.14
|
1.06
|
Revenue Deficit
|
-9.71
|
-9.87
|
-10.60
|
-14.00
|
-12.90
|
-15.03
|
-12.13
|
-22.59
|
Fiscal Deficit
|
10.67
|
7.47
|
4.47
|
2.56
|
7.99
|
4.92
|
13.22
|
3.50
|
Primary Deficit
|
4.97
|
2.32
|
-0.86
|
-2.13
|
2.72
|
0.42
|
8.08
|
-1.06
|
Outstanding Debt
|
61.88
|
60.30
|
61.16
|
62.31
|
63.27
|
70.46
|
66.61
|
64.12
|
Source (Basic Data): Finance Accounts
and State Budget 2011-12
Note: The GSDP figures are of 2004-05
series given by CSO.
Negative sign indicates revenue surplus
The TFC in their fiscal consolidation
path for Sikkim has targeted the fiscal deficit to decline to 3 per
cent of GSDP by 2013-14 and continue thereafter at that level. The
State FRBM act, enacted in 2010-11, stipulates to reduce the fiscal
deficit to 3 per cent of GSDP by 2013-14. Also necessary amendment
in the Act is done to comply with the numerical debt to GSDP ratio
path proposed by the TFC. The MTFP 2011-12 is compliant with the TFC
proposed path of fiscal consolidation.
3.2 Revenue Mobilisation
Revenue profile is dominated by central
transfers. Central transfers to GSDP ratio has increased sharply in
recent years and in 2011-12 BE it is expected to be 62.48 per cent.
This increase is due to the large increase in transfers in the form
of grants to the State. Own tax and own non–tax revenue are
expected to be 6.38 and 8.08 per cent of GSDP respectively as per the
BE of 2011-12. A disaggregated analysis of revenue performance of the
state is undertaken to determine the revenue prospects while
preparing the MTFP aligned with the provisions of FRBM act of Sikkim.
Composition of own tax revenue is
given in Table 2. Like other States, the sales tax/VAT is the major
source of own tax revenue in Sikkim accounting for about 59 percent
of own tax revenue. The relative share of VAT in total own tax
revenue has increased in recent years. In 2009-10, the VAT accounted
for about 54 per cent as against 41 per cent in 2004-05. The revised
estimates of 2009-10 and the budget estimates for 2010-11 show
further increase in the share of VAT revenue. The State excise is
another important source of revenue for the State, share of which has
increased in recent years. During the same time period the share of
motor vehicle tax has increased. The trend growth rates of
individual tax components explain the change in tax structure in the
state. The taxes like excise duty and VAT have shown higher growth
rates compared to other taxes during the period.
Table 2
Composition of Own Tax Revenue
(Per cent)
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11 (RE)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
Growth (04-05 to 11-12)
|
Own Tax Revenues
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
11.19
|
Income Tax
|
24.87
|
32.48
|
26.86
|
24.38
|
7.33
|
0.32
|
0.19
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Sales Tax
|
41.20
|
38.48
|
43.11
|
41.10
|
50.78
|
54.13
|
59.68
|
59.50
|
18.94
|
State Excise Duties
|
27.95
|
22.39
|
19.24
|
19.17
|
23.33
|
25.61
|
23.79
|
25.06
|
11.98
|
Motor Vehicle Tax
|
2.77
|
2.88
|
3.43
|
3.14
|
3.49
|
3.53
|
3.86
|
3.72
|
16.18
|
Stamp Duty and Registration Fees
|
1.22
|
1.54
|
1.45
|
2.15
|
2.19
|
2.00
|
1.34
|
1.21
|
11.49
|
Other Taxes
|
1.99
|
2.23
|
5.90
|
10.04
|
12.90
|
14.41
|
11.14
|
10.51
|
45.56
|
The tax specific buoyancies are given
in Table 3. The buoyancy of VAT during this period was 1.320. Motor
vehicle tax and other tax also showed higher than unity buoyancy. The
buoyancy coefficients of taxes like excise and stamp duty were below
unity.
Table 3
Buoyancy of Taxes: 2004-05 to 2011-12
Own Tax Revenues
|
1.272
|
Sales Tax
|
1.320
|
State Excise Duties
|
0.874
|
Motor Vehicle Tax
|
1.132
|
Stamp Duty and Registration Fees
|
0.835
|
Other Taxes
|
2.848
|
Source (Basic Data): Finance Accounts
and State Budget 2011-12
The non-tax revenue is an important
source of revenue for the State as it constitutes more than half of
the own revenue receipts. Income from State lottery, power sector and
road transport has been the main source of non-tax revenue (Table 4).
The income from power sector has increased over the years. The power
sector has made significant contribution based upon the income from
the hydel power projects. The income from power sector constituted
about 50 per cent of State’s own non-tax revenue during 2004-05
to 2011-12 BE. The income from lottery operations is another
important source of non-tax revenue for the State. The Government has
ventured into broad basing the lottery operations with the
introduction of the on-line lotteries. Further the State has
introduced on-line casino operations with the passage of Sikkim
Casino Games (Control & Tax) Act 2002. These initiatives are
expected to yield increasing revenue from lottery operations.
Table 4
Composition of States’ Own
Non-tax Revenues
(Per Cent)
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11 (RE)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
Own Non-Tax Revenue
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
Interest Receipts
|
7.21
|
5.54
|
3.11
|
7.12
|
8.87
|
9.92
|
7.19
|
4.10
|
Dividends and Profits
|
0.83
|
1.00
|
0.44
|
0.32
|
0.45
|
0.10
|
0.83
|
0.37
|
Police
|
3.93
|
12.41
|
8.09
|
6.90
|
4.00
|
3.26
|
9.95
|
11.58
|
Public Works
|
2.21
|
2.71
|
2.18
|
2.04
|
1.70
|
0.65
|
1.55
|
1.12
|
Administrative Services
|
3.39
|
2.57
|
1.47
|
1.22
|
0.87
|
0.99
|
1.42
|
0.84
|
Net Lottery Income
|
27.98
|
19.47
|
29.12
|
14.55
|
15.04
|
9.18
|
16.37
|
20.64
|
Education, Sports, Art & Culture
|
0.74
|
0.83
|
0.63
|
0.56
|
0.61
|
0.35
|
0.55
|
0.41
|
Medical and Public Health
|
0.88
|
0.80
|
0.35
|
0.54
|
0.33
|
0.23
|
0.23
|
0.17
|
Water Supply and Sanitation
|
0.98
|
1.02
|
1.20
|
0.99
|
0.88
|
0.59
|
1.16
|
1.03
|
Urban Development
|
0.80
|
0.60
|
0.37
|
0.60
|
0.55
|
0.68
|
0.31
|
0.23
|
Forestry and Wildlife
|
7.11
|
8.75
|
5.53
|
5.16
|
3.85
|
1.97
|
4.50
|
3.24
|
Plantations
|
1.47
|
1.76
|
1.14
|
0.99
|
0.80
|
0.40
|
1.10
|
0.83
|
Other Rural Development Programme
|
0.67
|
1.15
|
0.64
|
0.47
|
0.43
|
0.57
|
0.51
|
0.68
|
Power
|
19.22
|
24.57
|
33.87
|
46.06
|
52.95
|
64.18
|
40.92
|
44.23
|
Road Transport
|
19.32
|
12.00
|
8.65
|
7.36
|
6.03
|
4.56
|
9.29
|
7.00
|
Tourism
|
0.70
|
0.71
|
0.51
|
0.56
|
0.72
|
0.36
|
1.27
|
1.47
|
Others
|
2.55
|
4.09
|
2.72
|
4.56
|
1.92
|
1.99
|
2.85
|
2.05
|
Source (Basic Data): Finance Accounts
and State Budget 2011-12
Figure 1
Central Transfers as Percentage of GSDP
The tax devolution and grants as a
percentage of GSDP shown in Figure 1 reveal that even though the tax
devolution to GSDP remained more or less at around 15 per cent of
GSDP, the grant to GSDP ratio showed a sharp increase in recent
years. The revised estimates of 2010-11 and budget estimates of
2011-12 show improvements in grants from Centre. The State of Sikkim
will receive the TFC grants for universalisation of elementary
education, environment related grants including forest, renewable
energy, and water sector management, incentive grants to improve
quality of public expenditure, and grants for maintenance of roads
and bridges. The State of Sikkim will also receive performance
incentive grant, which was recommended by the TFC in response to
prudent fiscal management of the State. In addition, the TFC also
recommended State specific grants for Sikkim for development of
tourism, innovation of Suspension Foot Bridges under North Districts
of Sikkim, water Security and public health engineering, police
training and infrastructure, residential facility for police, boarder
area development, State Capacity building Institute, and conservation
of heritage and culture. These grants will contribute substantially
to the overall revenues of the State and facilitate building
infrastructure in the sectors for which grants are targeted.
3.3 Expenditure
The profile of government expenditure
of Sikkim is shown in Table 5. The revenue expenditure relative to
GSDP is expected to decline to 54.35 per cent in 2011-12 (BE) as
against 58.02 per cent in 2010-11 (RE). The impact of pay revision
with associated liabilities towards settlement of arrears has put
upward pressure on revenue expenditure seem to have been absorbed.
The revenue expenditure profile shows that while there is an increase
in the expenditure on general and economic services to GSDP ratio,
the expenditure on social services remained almost at the same level
as percentage of GSDP during this period. The MTFP elaborates on the
expenditure restructuring in the medium term during which it is
targeted to have higher level of development spending.
Table 5
Expenditure profile
(Per cent to GSDP)
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11 (RE)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
Revenue Expenditure
|
48.44
|
44.73
|
45.08
|
45.76
|
47.17
|
53.25
|
58.02
|
54.35
|
General Services
|
14.92
|
14.41
|
15.49
|
15.49
|
15.24
|
19.14
|
18.21
|
18.09
|
Interest Payment
|
5.70
|
5.15
|
5.33
|
4.70
|
5.27
|
4.50
|
5.14
|
4.56
|
Pension
|
1.77
|
2.08
|
2.28
|
2.00
|
2.03
|
3.66
|
3.84
|
3.54
|
Other General Services Excluding Salary
|
7.45
|
7.18
|
7.88
|
8.78
|
7.94
|
10.99
|
9.23
|
10.00
|
Social Services
|
17.63
|
16.95
|
16.47
|
17.49
|
18.46
|
20.12
|
22.87
|
17.20
|
Education
|
8.84
|
9.42
|
9.28
|
9.06
|
9.24
|
11.41
|
14.33
|
10.11
|
Medical and Public Health
|
2.79
|
2.31
|
2.28
|
2.59
|
2.57
|
3.15
|
2.78
|
2.43
|
Other Social Services
|
6.00
|
5.21
|
4.91
|
5.83
|
6.65
|
5.56
|
5.75
|
4.66
|
Economic Services
|
15.88
|
13.37
|
13.12
|
12.79
|
13.47
|
13.98
|
16.37
|
18.27
|
Compensation and Assignment to LBs
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.57
|
0.78
|
Capital Expenditure
|
20.38
|
17.34
|
15.07
|
16.56
|
20.90
|
19.95
|
25.35
|
26.08
|
Capital Outlay
|
20.33
|
17.35
|
15.11
|
16.58
|
20.90
|
18.88
|
25.22
|
25.03
|
Net Lending
|
0.05
|
-0.01
|
-0.04
|
-0.02
|
0.00
|
1.07
|
0.14
|
1.06
|
Source (Basic Data): Finance Accounts
and State Budget 2011-12
The capital expenditure, although
uneven and fluctuating, shows a rising trend in recent years. The
capital expenditure is expected to increase from 20.38 per cent of
GSDP in 2004-05 to 26.08 per cent in 2011-12 (BE) (See Table 5). The
profile of capital expenditure shows that the sectors like water
supply and sanitation, transport and tourism have attracted large
capital expenditure. While there is a need to augment capital
expenditure in critical areas of social and physical infrastructure,
the State needs to comply with the fiscal reforms prescribed by the
TFC to bring about fiscal discipline in the State and that can put a
limit on the level of capital expenditure. Concerted efforts are
needed to restructure government spending in a manner that sufficient
fiscal space is created to enable the government to spend on critical
areas. The MTFP is prepared based on this rationale.
Table 6
Composition of Capital Expenditure
(Per Cent)
%
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11 (RE)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
Education
|
8.34
|
7.22
|
7.73
|
4.75
|
4.83
|
3.60
|
5.26
|
5.26
|
Health
|
0.96
|
2.30
|
0.59
|
0.60
|
1.07
|
0.78
|
4.02
|
4.02
|
Water supply, Sanitation, Housing & Urban Development
|
27.38
|
21.97
|
27.22
|
25.60
|
24.70
|
30.02
|
34.14
|
34.14
|
Agriculture
|
1.12
|
1.48
|
1.77
|
1.72
|
1.48
|
1.60
|
1.45
|
1.45
|
Rural Development
|
3.32
|
1.88
|
7.69
|
9.20
|
4.04
|
4.16
|
2.98
|
2.98
|
Special Areas Programmes
|
0.87
|
7.18
|
8.01
|
5.49
|
1.68
|
1.04
|
2.14
|
2.14
|
Energy
|
28.17
|
25.46
|
11.69
|
11.44
|
10.12
|
12.07
|
10.97
|
10.97
|
Transport
|
20.29
|
20.67
|
19.09
|
20.38
|
29.13
|
22.03
|
23.03
|
23.03
|
Tourism
|
1.72
|
3.93
|
6.70
|
7.97
|
7.61
|
7.11
|
11.23
|
11.23
|
Others
|
7.83
|
7.91
|
9.50
|
12.84
|
15.34
|
17.59
|
4.79
|
4.79
|
Source (Basic Data): Finance Accounts
and State Budget 2011-12
3.4 Outstanding Debt and Government
Guarantee
As mentioned earlier, the outstanding debt of the Government of
Sikkim is declining in relation to GSDP in recent years. However, it
is still at a very high level. The outstanding debt as per cent of
GSDP, which was 61.88 per cent in 2004-05, increased to 70.46 per
cent in 2009-10 and started declining thereafter (See Table 7). The
accumulated stock of debt is the outcome of the fiscal profile that
has emerged over the years. The structure of outstanding debt has an
important bearing on interest payment as different debt instruments
carry different rates of interest depending on the type of borrowing
and maturity structure. The internal debt including the market
borrowing in the State has increased over the years while the share
of loans and advances from the Central government has declined
substantially (Table 7). The share of high cost debt instruments like
small savings, provident funds, etc. has registered a decline over
the years.
Table 7
Composition of Debt
(Per Cent)
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
Internal Debt
|
43.44
|
47.36
|
51.12
|
58.20
|
64.02
|
68.53
|
LA from the Central Government
|
29.43
|
27.27
|
24.58
|
20.22
|
16.20
|
12.78
|
State Provident Funds
|
26.12
|
24.33
|
23.21
|
20.52
|
18.76
|
17.72
|
Insurance and Pension Funds
|
1.01
|
1.04
|
1.09
|
1.06
|
1.01
|
0.97
|
Total Debt
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
The degree of debt overhang for Sikkim
as examined taking into consideration these criteria is given in
Table 8. The debt ratio remained much above 30 per cent of GSDP in
recent years (see Table 8). However, the debt as a percentage of TRR
remained much below 300 per cent and declining sharply in recent
years and it is expected to be as low as 83.35 per cent in 2011-12
(BE). The interest payment as a percentage of TRR remained below 18
per cent as indicated in the Planning Commission parameters. The
state government could generate a revenue surplus and the ratio of
debt growth to revenue growth is below the permissible target of
1.25. The state’s fiscal deficit remained below 25 per cent of
the TRR.
Guarantees given by the State
Government
As per the Sikkim Government Guarantee
Act, 2000, the ceiling on total outstanding government guarantee in a
year is restricted to three times of the State’s tax revenue
receipts of the second preceding year. The outstanding sums
guaranteed by the State government on 31st March 2009 were Rs.75
crore (see Finance Accounts – 2008-09, Government of Sikkim),
which was lower than the tax revenue of the State in the year
2006-07. However, the guarantee has increased to Rs. 360 crore in
2010-11 but remained within the permissible limit prescribed in the
Guarantee Act-2000, when compared with the revenue receipts of the
second preceeding year.
Table 8
Indicators of Debt Management
(Per Cent)
|
2004-05
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11 (RE)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
Debt Stock as per cent of GSDP
|
61.88
|
60.30
|
61.16
|
62.31
|
63.27
|
70.46
|
66.61
|
64.12
|
Debt as a per cent of TRR
|
106.41
|
110.44
|
109.85
|
104.27
|
105.34
|
103.19
|
94.96
|
83.35
|
Interest payment as a per cent of TRR
|
9.81
|
9.43
|
9.58
|
7.86
|
8.78
|
6.58
|
7.33
|
5.92
|
Growth rate of debt
|
14.19
|
11.68
|
9.98
|
18.15
|
18.60
|
30.68
|
4.61
|
6.83
|
Growth rate of revenue
|
12.50
|
7.60
|
10.57
|
24.47
|
17.39
|
33.40
|
13.68
|
21.72
|
Ratio debt growth-revenue growth
|
1.14
|
1.54
|
0.94
|
0.74
|
1.07
|
0.92
|
0.34
|
0.31
|
FD as a per cent of TRR
|
18.35
|
13.68
|
8.03
|
4.29
|
13.31
|
7.20
|
18.85
|
4.54
|
4. Medium Term Fiscal Plan: 2010-11 to
2012-13
The Government of Sikkim has enacted the FRBM act in 2010-11 and
this is the first MTFP document containing the fiscal projections for
the period 2011-12 (BE) to 2013-14. The first year of the MTFP is
the budget year. While preparing the MTFP it was assumed that
economy of Sikkim will grow at the rate of GSDP growth prescribed by
the TFC on a year on year basis for the period from 2010-11 to
2013-14. The aggregate own tax revenue buoyancy of the State for the
period between 2004-05 and 2011-12 (BE) is 1.272. For the purpose of
MTFP, prescriptive buoyancies for individual taxes have been the
observed buoyancy of taxes for the period from 2004-05 to 2011-12
(BE) reported in Box 1. The MTFP proposes to keep the trend growth
rate of non-tax revenues for the period from 2004-05 to 2011-12 (BE)
for the purpose of projection. In the case of central transfers also,
the recommended State specific grants by the TFC are factored in
during the projection year. For the share in central taxes budgetary
figures for the year 2011-12 are taken and these are allowed to grow
at observed rate of trend growth rate during 2004-05 to 2011-12 (BE).
Expenditure Restructuring under MTFP
The MTFP aims to keep the Government’s
priority of emphasizing on development expenditure. The MTFP does not
attempt to compress the revenue expenditure as the surplus in the
revenue account has been large and the measures to compress the
expenditure may adversely affect the spending in the development
sector in revenue account. The revenue expenditure during the MTFP
period is projected to increase from 54.35 per cent relative to GSDP
in 2011-12 (BE) to 60.23 per cent in 2013-14. The rise in revenue
expenditure is due to the increase in general services expenditure by
more than 2 percentage points and also social and economic services
expenditure by around 2 percentage points relative to GSDP.
Debt and Deficit under MTFP
The revenue augmentation measures and
the expected central devolution discussed above is expected to
generate a revenue surplus profile as given in Table 9. With the
prescriptive buoyancy of own tax revenues and growth of expenditure
suggested, the State is expected to increase its revenue surplus
further during the MTFP period (See Table 9). The fiscal deficit as
per the BE 2011-12 is estimated to be 3.5 per cent of GSDP, while in
the year 2012-13 and 2013-14, the fiscal deficit target is fixed at
3.5 and 3 per cent respectively to comply with the Sikkim State
specific path of fiscal adjustment prescribed by the TFC. The
emerged fiscal profile shows a decline in the debt stock to GSDP
ratio from 64.12 per cent in 2011-12(BE) to 61.14 per cent in 2012-13
and 57.96 per cent in 2013-14. This debt-GSDP ratio path complies
with the debt path for Sikkim proposed by the TFC. The TFC has
assumed a debt-GSDP ratio of 65.2 in 2011-12, 62.1 in 2012-13 and
58.8 in 2013-14 (see Report of TFC, Annex 9.1, pp 409). Also during
this period, the capital expenditure to GSDP ratio is expected to
increase from 26.08 per cent in 2011-12(BE) to 32.51 per cent in
2013-14. It needs to be emphasized here that the State Government is
committed to achieving the objectives of the FRBM Act to reduce
fiscal deficit and stabilize the debt burden and conform to the debt
target proposed by the TFC in their fiscal consolidation path for
Sikkim.
Box 1
Proposed MTFP Targets
Macro Parameters
Revenue Resources
Sales tax assumes a buoyancy of
1.32 per cent
The state excise duty assumes a
buoyancy of 0.874
The stamp duty and registration
fees assumes a buoyancy of 0.835
Motor Vehicle tax assumes a
buoyancy of 1.132
Other taxes assumes a buoyancy
of 2.848
Expenditure Projections
Pension payments are projected
on the basis of the historical growth rates for pension payments
for the period from 2004-05 to 2011-12 (BE). The observed growth
of pension during this period was 27.38 per cent.
The interest payments have been
estimated on the basis of the effective rate of interest
calculated on the base year (2010-11) value of interest payment
divided by the stock of debt of the previous year.
The growth rates in the area of
high priority development expenditure in social services and
within that, in health and education, are assumed to continue
during the MTFP period.
Social services expenditures
will grow at the rate of 17 per cent per annum.
Education expenditure will grow
at the rate of 19.06 per cent per annum
Health expenditure will grow at
the rate of 15.22 per cent per annum.
Capital expenditure to GSDP
ratio is expected to increase from 26.08 per cent to 32.51 per
cent of GSDP during the MTFP period
Deficit and Debt targets
The MTFP 2011-12 to 2013-14
projects the revenue surplus to increase from 22.59 per cent of
the GSDP to 29.51per cent.
The fiscal deficit is projected
to reduce from 3.5 to 3per cent of GSDP
The outstanding debt to GSDP ratio is expected to decline
from 64.12 per cent to 57.96 per cent.
|
Table 9
Medium Term
Fiscal Plan: 2011-12 (BE) to 2013-14
(Per cent to GSDP)
|
2011-12 (BE)
|
2012-13
|
2013-14
|
Revenue Receipts
|
76.93
|
83.06
|
89.74
|
Own Tax Revenues
|
6.38
|
6.60
|
6.84
|
Income Tax
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Sales Tax
|
3.80
|
3.89
|
3.98
|
State Excise Duties
|
1.60
|
1.60
|
1.60
|
Motor Vehicle Tax
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
0.24
|
Stamp Duty and Registration Fees
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
Other Taxes
|
0.67
|
0.79
|
0.94
|
Own Non-Tax Revenues
|
8.08
|
8.67
|
9.31
|
Central Taransfers
|
62.48
|
67.79
|
73.59
|
Tax Share
|
14.95
|
16.91
|
19.13
|
Grants
|
47.52
|
50.88
|
54.46
|
Revenue Expenditure
|
54.35
|
57.20
|
60.23
|
General Services
|
18.09
|
19.24
|
20.46
|
Interest Payment
|
4.56
|
4.66
|
4.44
|
Pension
|
3.54
|
4.05
|
4.64
|
Other General Services
|
10.00
|
10.53
|
11.38
|
Social Services
|
17.20
|
18.04
|
18.92
|
Education
|
10.11
|
10.82
|
11.58
|
Medical and Public Health
|
2.43
|
2.52
|
2.61
|
Other Social Services
|
4.66
|
4.71
|
4.74
|
Economic Services
|
18.27
|
19.22
|
20.22
|
Compensation and Assignment to LBs
|
0.78
|
0.70
|
0.63
|
Capital Expenditure
|
26.08
|
29.35
|
32.51
|
Capital Outlay
|
25.03
|
28.31
|
31.47
|
Net Lending
|
1.06
|
1.05
|
1.04
|
Revenue Deficit
|
-22.59
|
-25.85
|
-29.51
|
Fiscal Deficit
|
3.50
|
3.50
|
3.00
|
Primary Deficit
|
-1.06
|
-1.16
|
-1.44
|
Outstanding Debt
|
64.12
|
61.14
|
57.96
|
GSDP (In Rs. Crore)
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
5. Conclusion
Form D-1
(See Rule 4)
Select Fiscal Indicators
Sl. No.
|
Item
|
Previous Year
2009-10 (Actuals)
|
Current Year
2010-11(RE)
|
1
|
Gross Fiscal Deficit as Percentage to GSDP
|
4.92
|
13.22
|
2
|
Revenue Deficit as Percentage of GSDP
|
-15.03
|
-12.13
|
3
|
Revenue Deficit as Percentage of Gross Fiscal Deficit
|
-305.80
|
-91.70
|
4
|
Revenue deficit as Percentage of TRR
|
-22.02
|
-17.29
|
5
|
Debt Stock as Percentage of GSDP
|
70.46
|
66.61
|
6
|
Total Liabilities as Percentage to GSDP
|
70.46
|
66.61
|
7
|
Capital Outlay as Percentage of Gross Fiscal Deficit
|
405.79
|
191.74
|
8
|
Interest Payment as Percentage of TRR
|
6.58
|
7.33
|
9
|
Salary Expenditure as Percentage of TRR
|
35.21
|
37.61
|
10
|
Pension Exp. As Percentage of TRR
|
5.36
|
5.48
|
11
|
Non-development Expenditure as Percentage of Aggregate
Disbursements
|
26.20
|
21.80
|
12
|
Non-tax Revenue as Percentage of TRR
|
19.08
|
9.32
|
Form D-2
(See Rule 4)
Components of State Government
Liabilities
Category
|
Raised during the fiscal year
|
Repayment during the fiscal year
|
Outstanding Amount
(End March)
|
Previous Year (Actuals)
|
Current year
(RE)
|
Previous Year (Actuals)
|
Current year
(RE)
|
Previous Year (Actuals)
|
Current year
(RE)
|
Internal Debt
|
39185.59
|
9980.96
|
6754.91
|
5190.11
|
151005.00
|
155795.85
|
Loan from Centre
|
25.00
|
384.01
|
1873.76
|
2196.02
|
28163.00
|
26350.99
|
State Provident Funds
|
10456.85
|
15200.00
|
6160.64
|
9800.00
|
39036.73
|
44436.73
|
Insurance and Pension Funds
|
326.91
|
350.00
|
65.63
|
100.00
|
2140.00
|
2390.00
|
Reserve Funds/Deposits
|
9553.02
|
10553.06
|
8525.97
|
8031.96
|
21675.92
|
24215.43
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form D-3
(See Rule 4)
Guarantees Given by the Government (Rs.
Lakh)
Sr. No.
|
Name of the Organization
|
2008-09
|
2009-10
|
2010-11
|
1
|
Sikkim State SC/ST/OBC Development corporation
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2
|
Sikkim Power Development Corporation
|
5000
|
5000
|
5000
|
3
|
SBI Capital
|
0
|
0
|
28500
|
|
Total
|
7500
|
7500
|
36000
|
Form D-4
(See Rule 4)
Number of Employees in Public Sector
Undertakings & Aided Institutions and Expenditure of State
Government
Sl. No.
|
Sector Name
|
Total Employees
as on 31-03-2011
|
Related Expenditure during
(Rs. in Lakh)
|
On Salary
|
On Pension
|
|
Regular Government Employees
|
31565
|
103274
|
14800.00
|
|
Government aided salaried employees
|
1716
|
|
|
|
Temporary employees
|
14900
|
|
|
NB: A few Public Sector Enterprise /
Undertaking are in the process of winding up / closure. Hence the
updated information on the actual number of employees, the
expenditure on salaries & pension shall be placed subsequently.
Form D-2
(See Rule 4)
Components of State Government
Liabilities
Category
|
Raised during the fiscal year
|
Repayment during the fiscal year
|
Outstanding Amount
(End March)
|
Previous Year (Actuals)
|
Current year
(RE)
|
Previous Year (Actuals)
|
Current year
(RE)
|
Previous Year (Actuals)
|
Current year
(RE)
|
Internal Debt
|
39185.59
|
9980.96
|
6754.91
|
5190.11
|
151005.00
|
155795.85
|
Loan from Centre
|
25.00
|
384.01
|
1873.76
|
2196.02
|
28163.00
|
26350.99
|
State Provident Funds
|
10456.85
|
15200.00
|
6160.64
|
9800.00
|
39036.73
|
44436.73
|
Insurance and Pension Funds
|
326.91
|
350.00
|
65.63
|
100.00
|
2140.00
|
2390.00
|
Reserve Funds/Deposits
|
9553.02
|
10553.06
|
8525.97
|
8031.96
|
21675.92
|
24215.43
|
Other Liabilities
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Form D-4
(See Rule 4)
Number of Employees in Public Sector
Undertakings & Aided Institutions and Expenditure of State
Government
Sl. No.
|
Sector Name
|
Total Employees
as on 31-03-2011
|
Related Expenditure during
(Rs. in Lakh)
|
On Salary
|
On Pension
|
|
Regular Government Employees
|
31565
|
103274
|
14800.00
|
|
Government aided salaried employees
|
1716
|
|
|
|
Temporary employees
|
14900
|
|
|